|
witnessed with increasing
intensity, like the 1994 epidemic in western Rajasthan and tile 1995
outbreaks along the Indo-Bhutan border, and in Madhya Pradesh and Manipur. In
1996, Haryana and Rajasthan witnessed epidemic. Haryana was the badly
affected state causing 1832 malaria deaths. Again, in 1997, Gujrat and Goa and in 1998, Bhandara
district of Maharastra and Calcutta district of West Bengal
witnessed the malaria out breaks. P. falciparum,
which during the 60's had almost touched the zero level, it has reached to
48% of the total malaria cases in 2002 and around 50% in last 2-3 years.
In addition to rural malaria, urban malaria, which was a
negligible problem at the time of launching of the programme
in 1958, has emerged as an important paradigm, accounting for 14 to 15% of
the total malaria cases. Regions,
where large-scale irrigation has been developed, have now become regions of
endemic malaria, with their mosquito-genic
potential being man's contribution. DDT still be in
use as cheap insecticide to control malaria. Usage of insecticide treated bednets still very limited.
In 2010, India
reported around 1.60 million confirmed cases of malaria which was 21.3% lower
than the 2000. But API does not changed much and reached at 1.37 during the
said period. However, the reported deaths
during the same period has gone up from 924 to 1023, showing an increase
of 9%.
The ABER is approximately 10% of the population at risk of
malaria. Slide positivity rates fell
from 2.34% in 2000 to 1.47% in 2010.
The percentage of cases due to P.falciparum
has increased and reached upto52%. 64%
of reported cases derived from five states namely, Orissa, Jharkhand,
Chhattisgarh, Maharashtra and West Bengal.
IRS has been the main strategy for vector control,
covering about 53.4 million people at risk in
2010. Also, programme delivered 2.52 million ITNs
/ LLINs making availability of cumulative effective
bednets to 4.75 millions covering around 9.50 million population at high risk of malaria (Fig. 2). The bednet
coverage has declined
significantly due to change of government policy fom ITNs to LLINs alone. sA demographic and household
survey carried out in 2005–2006 reflects
that 36% of households owned a mosquito net. In 2010, total,1.5 million first-line treatments courses delivered and
2.87 million ACTs were made available for treatment of Pf cases (Fig 3).
The total funding for malaria programmes
from all sources has
increased from US$ 54 million in 2001 to about US$ 117.05
million in 2010. This increase is primarily due to enhancement in the
government funding (US$ 91.55 million or 78% of all malaria
expenditure). The contributions from Global Fund and the World Bank were US$ 15.24 million and US$ 10.26
million respectively. The highest amount was spent on insecticides and
spraying materials followed by planning / administration, Anti-malarials and LLINS/ITNs
respectively.
Control strategy:
ACD and PCD, lab diagnosis and treatment.
Treatment in the periphery through
malaria clinic, drug distribution centers.
Selective IRS with DDT and malathion in area with API >
2.0 o/oo, in urban areas: barricading, source
reduction and biological control.
ACT adopted for treatment in selected areas.
Insecticide treated bednets
are being used but needs to be promotion in big way.
Goals and Targets:
To reduce malaria morbidity and mortality until the
disease is no longer a public health problem in the country.
|
Targets
|
Baseline data
in 2005
|
2010
|
Achievement upto 2010
|
|
To reduce the morbidity by 50%of the rate in 2000
by the year 2010
|
2.09 / 1000
|
1.04/ 1000
|
1.37/1000
|
|
To reduce the mortality by 75%of the rate in 2000
by the year 2010
|
0.1/ 100000
|
0.05 100000
|
0.09/100000
|
|
% of fever cases suspected to be malaria are
diagnosed either by RDTs or microscopy within 24
hours of the first contact to health services
|
N.A.
|
70
|
35 ( Based on Reports of LQAS Surveys done in
project districts of 5 states namely Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh,
Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Orissa )
|
|
% of malaria cases in targeted districts receive
prompt and effective treatment as per national drug policy within 24 hours
of first contact with the health care provider
|
N.A.
|
70
|
33 ( Based on Reports of LQAS Surveys done in
project districts of 2 states namely Jharkhand and Orissa )
|
|
% of people sleep under effective ITNs/LLINs in target areas
|
N.A.
|
30
|
25 ( Based on Reports of LQAS Surveys done in
project districts of 2 states namely Orissa and Chhattisgarh )
|
|
% coverage of households in targeted high risk
areas with spray of effective insecticides
|
N.A.
|
80
|
77.16
|
Achievements and
Initiatives
Incidence of malaria has been brought
down below 2 million cases annually since 2002 and sustained near 1.5 million
in recent years
12 million fever cases tested for malaria
with RDT
Pf
cases are treated with ACT
Procurement of LLINs
initiated in the country & 2.52 million LLINs distributed in 2010
170,000 ASHAs
(Community based services providers) trained on malaria diagnosis &
treatment
1-2 Sentinel sites identified for
assessing the burden of severe malaria and case fatality
Improved surveillance and supervision by
providing additional 3500 MPWs and 300 MTS
respectively
Issues and
challenges:
The constraints impending the progress
include insecticide resistance in A. culicifacies
and A. stephensi, the major rural and urban vectors
obtaining in the country, and exophily and exophagy in A. dirus, A. minimum and A. fluviatilis
in the wet climatic zones.
The drug resistance of P. falciparum to chloroquine is
widespread. However for SP, low to moderate level resistance is observed in
north-east states, in kolar district in Karnataka, . and one district each in
Madhya Pradesh and West Bengal respectively.
Quinine resistance is limited to few places of North-East states only.
Problem of urban malaria is one of major
hurdle for malaria control programme.
Scarcity of funds, man made malariogenic condition by various development projects,
transmigration are other main problems in malaria control programme.
Difficulty in regular malaria
surveillance activities due to difficult terrain conditions like hills and
forests poses many problems.
Vacancy of key positions of programme in the states
Frequent shifting of various programme officers at states, zonal and country level.
Inadequacy of transports affecting
supervision of operational activities.
Partners and donors
Global fund
World Bank
WHO
Other related
links:
Country
profile – World Malaria report 2011 [PDF 558 KB]
Malaria
Situation in India, 2010 [PDF 1.7 MB]
Country profile – World Malaria report 2009
Reported
Malaria Morbidity (/1000) and Mortality Rate (/100000) in India, 2000-2008
[PDF 79 KB]
Malaria
situation in India, 2008 [PDF 647 KB]
State-wise
Malaria Situation in India, 2006 [PDF 2.96 MB]
State-wise Malaria Situation in
India, 2004 [PDF 334 KB]
State-wise malaria
situation in India, 2003, [PDF 2.60 MB]
Malaria
Endemicity situation in India [PDF 334 KB]
Malaria
Situation in the Districts under World Bank Supported Enhanced Malaria
Control Project (EMCP) [PDF 1.08 MB]
Map
Showing Intensified Malaria Control Project Under GFATM Support [PDF 227 KB]
Early
Diagonosis And Prompt Treatment in India,2004 [PDF 41 KB]
Integrated
Vector Management in India, 2001-2005 [PDF 28
KB]
IRS Coverage in India, 2004-2005
[PDF 104 KB]
ITN coverage
in India, 2004-2006 [PDF 125 KB]
Status
of Insecticide Treated Bet Nets in India [PDF 28 KB]
Status of Larvivorous Fish in India 2005 [PDF 75 KB]
Gap Between
Actual Disease Burden and Reported Information of Malaria in India [PDF 95 KB]
Towns/Cities
Under Urban Malaria Scheme in India [PDF 338
KB]
Number
of Persons Trained in Malaria, 1998-2003 [PDF 10
KB]
Percentage
Bednet usage in states (2002) [PDF 75 KB]
|