|
PDF Version
Short Note 5
Breeding of Dengue Vector Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus) in Rural Thar Desert, North-western Rajasthan, India
B.K. Tyagi#
and J. Hiriyan
Centre for Research in Medical Entomology,
Indian Council of Medical Research, 4 Sarojini
Street,
Chinna Chokkikulam, Madurai 625 002, India
Aedes aegypti,
the vector of dengue fever, is widely present in India[1,2],
including the Thar desert in north-western
Rajasthan. Jalore town in the Thar desert experienced the first-ever
epidemic of dengue fever in 1985. Entomological studies carried out in Jalore during 1990 and subsequently in 1996 observed
extensive breeding of Aedes aegypti[3,4].
Recently, dengue fever again struck the Thar, this
time in Jodhpur district, warranting a serious review of the vector ecology
in the region, particularly in view of the prodigious breeding of Aedes aegypti in
discarded household and community-based underground water reservoirs called tankas, of which thousands are formed in different
forms in the Thar[3]. These tankas, which originally attracted only the malaria
vector Anopheles stephensi as long as the
water remained potable, started breeding Aedes
aegypti only after being discarded by local
populations in the wake of the recent availability of conduit-based water
supply under Indira Gandhi Nahar
Pariyojana (IGNP canal project). It is, therefore,
considered worthwhile to highlight the association of Aedes
aegypti and tankas
in sustaining the vector population under extreme xeric conditions.
A total of 33 villages in the three districts of Jodhpur,
Jaisalmer and Sri Ganganagar
(now incorporated partly in the newly created Hanumangarh
district) were surveyed for the presence of tankas
(Table 1). Compared to those of Jodhpur
and Jaisalmer, most villages in Sri Ganganagar are highly irrigated and adequately supplied
with the conduit-water system. Four major types of water storing facilities
were identified which supported the breeding of Aedes
aegypti. About 13.6% of the tankas,
which constituted 77.1% of the four water bodies, were found to be breeding Aedes aegypti. It
is noteworthy that the typical century-old traditional earthen-type tanka was almost invariably present in most
villages of Jodhpur (88.8%) and Jaisalmer (85.7%) but less so in Sri Ganganagar
(17%) where canal-based water storage sources
had greatly reduced the existence of the tankas.
As many as 11 (24.4%) out of a total of 45 community tankas
existing peripherally in Kanasar village were
abandoned for want of proper water storage facility and rendered uncared for
by the villagers. All such tankas, wherein
the water turned turbid in course of time including vegetation growth, Aedes aegypti was
invariably found to breed, replacing in the process its earlier and original
occupant, the malaria vector Anopheles stephensi.
The first instar larvae abounded the most (52.3%),
while the fourth instar larvae (7.8%) was present
the least, followed by pupae (2.5%). This situation clearly indicated a
sustained breeding of Aedes aegypti in the tankas.
Cement tanks, invariably constructed in close vicinity of bore-wells, for
cattle drinking bred Aedes aegypti as soon as the water there turned turbid due
to prolonged use by cattle, sometimes with Anopheles subpictus. None of the beris,
another type of earthen reservoir in the desert environment, supported the
breeding of Aedes aegypti.
Table 1. Distribution of different
kinds of tankas and beris
in various villages in three districts currently under varying degrees of
irrigation and/or conduit water supply from canals
|
District
|
No. of villages
|
No. of villages with different types of ‘tankas’
|
Beris
|
Cement tanks
|
|
Typical intra-domestic earthen tankas
|
Metallic mobile tankas
|
Central community tankas
|
Peripheral village tankas
assembly
|
|
–
|
+
|
++
|
–
|
+
|
++
|
–
|
+
|
++
|
–
|
+
|
++
|
–
|
+
|
++
|
–
|
+
|
++
|
|
Sri Ganganagar
|
17
|
9
|
5
|
3
|
4
|
13
|
0
|
0
|
17
|
0
|
17
|
0
|
0
|
17
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
12
|
3
|
|
Jodhpur
|
9
|
1
|
5
|
3
|
0
|
8
|
1
|
0
|
9
|
0
|
0
|
8
|
1
|
8
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
7
|
2
|
|
Jaisalmer
|
7
|
1
|
6
|
0
|
0
|
7
|
0
|
0
|
7
|
0
|
0
|
6
|
1
|
6
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
6
|
1
|
|
Total
|
33
|
11
|
16
|
6
|
4
|
28
|
1
|
0
|
33
|
0
|
17
|
14
|
2
|
31
|
2
|
0
|
2
|
25
|
6
|
– = Absence of breeding habitat
+ = Presence of breeding habitat, with potable water breeding Anopheles stephensi
++ = Presence of abandoned breeding habitat positive for Aedes
aegypti breeding
Conclusion
The dengue vector, Aedes aegypti,
has so far been collected from the Thar desert
only from townships and/or desert fringe areas in the vicinity of urban
environment, breeding mostly in household pitchers and cement tanks[2,4,5]. The breeding of Aedes
aegypti in the tankas in
the rural areas of the Thar desert is
considered to be a rather recent phenomenon, possibly due to the easy accessibility
of newly provided conduit-water supply to villages, which has led to the
abandoning of the traditional water reservoirs.
References
1. Kalra NL, Wattal BL and Raghvan
NGS. Distribution pattern of Aedes aegypti in India
and some ecological considerations. Bull Ind Soc Mal Comm
Dis, 1968, 5: 307-334.
2. Kalra NL, Kaul SM and Rastogi
RM. Prevalence of Aedes aegypti and Aedes
albopictus vectors of DF/DHF in north,
north-east and central India.
Dengue Bulletin, 1997, 21: 84-92.
3. Chouhan
GS, Rodrigues FM, Sheikh BH, Ilkal
MA, Khangaro SS, Mathur
KN, Joshi KR and Vaidhye NK. Clinical and virological study of dengue fever outbreak in Jalore city, Rajasthan, 1985. Indian J Med Res, 1990, 91: 414-418.
4. Joshi V, Mathur ML, Dixit
AK and Singhi
M. Entomological studies in a dengue endemic area Jalore,
Rajasthan. Indian J Med Res, 1996, 104: 161-165.
5. Tyagi
BK. A note on the breeding of vector mosquitoes in cement tanks and pit
latrines. J Appl Zool Res, 1994, 5: 149-151.
|