|
PDF Version
Detection of Dengue Virus Serotype-specific
IgM
by IgM Capture ELISA in the Presence of
Sodium thiocyanate (NaSCN)
Masaru
Nawa*#, Tomohiko
Takasaki**, Mikako Ito**, Ichiro Kurane**
and Toshitaka Akatsuka*
*Department of Microbiology, Saitama
Medical School, 38, Moroyama, Saitama 350-0495,
Japan
**Division of Vector-Borne Viruses, Department of Virology 1, National
Institute of Infectious Diseases,
1-23-1, Toyama, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8640, Japan
|
Abstract
Dengue virus serotype-specific IgM was
detected by IgM-capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (IgM-ELISA)
in the presence of a chaotropic agent, sodium thiocyanate (NaSCN). NaSCN did not affect the reactions between anti-human IgM and patients’ IgM, and
between dengue viral antigens and detecting antibody, peroxidase-conjugated
flavivirus-specific monoclonal antibody D1-4G2 IgG. Among 18 dengue-confirmed cases, highest IgM responses were detected to infecting serotypes in
14 cases in the presence of 0.5 M of NaSCN. The
results indicate that: (i) the protein-denaturing
agent, NaSCN, affects antigen-antibody reaction
in IgM-ELISA, and enables the differentiation of
serotype-specific IgM from cross-reactive IgM; and (ii) IgM responses
against the infecting serotypes are higher than those against the other
three serotypes in most primary dengue virus infection. In conclusion, the
addition of NaSCN to IgM-capture
ELISA is useful for highlighting serotype-specific IgM
responses in primary dengue virus infections.
Keywords: Dengue, IgM-capture
ELISA, serotype-specific IgM response, sodium thiocyanate, NaSCN.
|
Introduction
Dengue is currently one of the most important arboviral
disease in humans. Dengue viruses, belonging to the
family Flaviviridae, are comprised of four antigenically cross-reactive serotypes and are
responsible for epidemics in tropical and subtropical countries. Since the
dengue outbreaks in Osaka, Kobe, Hiroshima and Nagasaki from 1942 to 1945, dengue has not occurred
in an epidemic form in Japan[1]. However, imported dengue cases have
been reported[2]. Approximately five million
Japanese people annually visit countries in tropical and subtropical areas and
nearly two million people visit Japan from these areas. Therefore, dengue fever
(DF) and dengue haemorrhagic fever (DHF) has become
an infectious disease of significance and worthy of more attention from the
medical community in Japan.
We have earlier reported the laboratory diagnosis of dengue by reverse
transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and IgM-ELISA[3-5]. We demonstrated that IgM-ELISA
was a reliable diagnostic method and that IgM
responses were generally serotype cross-reactive but often highest against infecting
virus serotype in most Japanese cases[4]. The serotype specificity of IgM responses in dengue patients has been controversial[6-8]. Burke had reported that
serotype-specific IgM responses corresponding to
the isolated virus type were detected in primary dengue virus infection[6]. Gubler had
reported that in dengue infection, frequent monotypic IgM
responses were not correlated with the virus serotype isolated from patients[7]. In 1984, Inouye et al.[9]
demonstrated a new technique for the differentiation of antibody avidity
after virus infection, i.e. rubella, rota and
Japanese encephalitis viruses. They estimated the antibody avidity to viral antigen
using a low concentration of a protein-denaturing agent, guanidine
hydrochloride, in the diluent of antibody in the
ELISA. They concluded that the “stringent immunosorption”
technique was useful for investigating the antigenic relationship among closely-related
viruses.
In the present study, we examined serotype-specific IgM
responses under stringent conditions in the presence of a chaotropic
agent, sodium thiocyanate (NaSCN),
in the reaction mixture of dengue viral antigens and patients’ sera. The
development of a simple method to distinguish serotype-specific reaction from
cross-reaction will be useful not only for laboratory diagnosis but also for seroepidemiological studies.
Materials and methods
Twenty-eight serum specimens from 18 confirmed Japanese dengue cases were
used in the study. Serum samples from 22 Japanese subjects with other
illnesses, who had never been to areas where dengue was epidemic-prone or
endemic, were used as the control. These sera were obtained for diagnostic
purposes in clinics and hospitals in Japan from 2000 to 2002 and sent to the
Department of Virology 1, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Prototype dengue viruses were propagated in the Aedes
albopictus mosquito cell clone C6/36, and the infected
cell culture supernatants were inactivated by incubation with beta-propiolactone at a final concentration of 0.2% for 30
minutes at 37 °C as previously reported[10].
Tetravalent and four monovalent dengue viral
antigens were prepared by the method as previously reported[4,5].
The IgM capture ELISA was carried out according to
the method described previously[3-5]. Anti-human IgM (µ chain specific) goat serum and peroxidase-conjugated
anti-human IgM were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich,
Inc, USA. The IgG fraction of the flavivirus-specific
monoclonal antibody, D1-4G2, was prepared by the Protein G affinity
chromatography kit (ImmunoPure G IgG Purification kit, PIERCE, USA), and then conjugated with horseradish peroxidase by a commercial kit (EZ-Link Plus Activated Peroxidase kit, PIERCE, USA).
In order to detect the serotype-specific reaction between dengue viral
antigen and dengue virus-specific IgM antibody,
patient serum was treated with the Protein G affinity chromatography kit
described above. The IgG fraction in the serum
specimen was removed by adding Protein G beads according to the
manufacturer’s instruction. Unless otherwise stated, data were presented as
the mean of independent two-to-three assays.
Results and discussion
One of the authors has previously reported that the addition of NaSCN to the reaction mixture of ELISA highlights
serotype-specific reaction between crude dengue viral antigen and anti-dengue
hyperimmunized mouse sera[11].
The antigen-antibody reaction was affected not only by the concentration of NaSCN but also by the procedures of the NaSCN treatment. A concentration higher than 0.7 M
inhibited the reaction non-specifically, while a concentration lower than 0.3
M had no effect on the discrimination of serotype-specific reaction from the
cross-reactive one. According to these results, we decided to use NaSCN in IgM-capture ELISA at
the following conditions: (i) NaSCN
was included at a final concentration of 0.5 M in 10% normal calf serum-PBS;
(ii) peroxidase-conjugated flavivirus-
specific monoclonal antibody D1-4G2 (D1-4G2) was diluted in 0.5 M NaSCN; and (iii) viral antigens captured by patients’ IgM were detected by the detection antibody in 0.5 M NaSCN.
Figure 1. The effects of NaSCN
treatment on antigen-antibody reaction
(a) Human serum was serially
diluted from 1:50 to 1:400 with
10% CS-PBS containing 0.5 M NaSCN, and IgM was captured on anti-human IgM
goat serum-coated wells. IgM was detected with peroxidase-conjugated anti-human IgM
goat serum. (b) Serially diluted tetravalent dengue viral antigen was
captured on the solid phase sensitized with D1-4G2 IgG,
and then detected with peroxidase-conjugated D1-4G2
IgG in the presence of 0.5 M NaSCN.
Figure
1 shows the reactions between anti-human IgM and
patients’ IgM (a), and dengue viral antigen and the
detection antibody (b), in the presence of 0.5 M NaSCN
in the ELISA. These two reactions were not affected by 0.5 M NaSCN, suggesting that IgM
capture and detection of dengue viral antigens were
not affected in IgM-capture ELISA.
Figure
2 shows anti-dengue IgM titration curves in the
presence or absence of 0.5 M NaSCN in the ELISA.
The IgG fraction in the serum specimen was removed
by adsorption with the Protein G beads (UltraLink
Immobilized Protein G Plus, capacity: ~25 mg IgG/ml
of the gel, PIERCE). The levels of cross-reaction
between dengue viral antigens and patients’ IgM
antibody (a) were decreased after the treatment with 0.5 M NaSCN in the ELISA (b): The level of reaction with
homologous dengue-1 antigen was less affected. The results suggested that the
addition of 0.5 M NaSCN to the reaction mixture of
ELISA may highlight a serotype-specific reaction between crude dengue viral
antigen and anti-dengue IgM antibody.
Figure 2. Titration curves
of dengue virus specific IgM antibody in the
presence
or absence of 0.5 M NaSCN in the ELISA
|

The IgG
fraction was removed according to the method described in the Materials and
Methods section. Protein G-treated serum specimen was serially diluted from
1:20 to 1:2560 in the absence
(a) and in presence of 0.5 M NaSCN (b) in 10%
CS-PBS, and then reacted on the plates coated with each of 4 dengue viral
antigens. Dengue virus-specific IgM antibody was
detected with 1:500 diluted peroxidase-conjugated
anti-human IgM goat serum.
|
We examined the IgM levels by ELISA with the antigen of 4 dengue virus
serotypes. The table below shows the results of 28 serum samples from 18
Japanese dengue patients. The infecting dengue virus serotypes were
determined by RT-PCR. The data were presented as the index value according to
the method described previously[4].
We defined index values of 2.28 or greater and 26.60 or greater as positive,
respectively, in the absence and presence of 0.5 M NaSCN
in the ELISA. In all the tested cases, the serotype-specific IgM levels were the highest against the infecting dengue
virus serotype than against three other serotypes in the presence of NaSCN. The serotype-specific IgM
responses were more highlighted in the presence of NaSCN
than in its absence. These data suggest that IgM
responses to the infected dengue virus serotype determined by RT-PCR in
primary dengue infection were the highest. These results agreed with the
report by Burke[6].
Table. Serodiagnosis of dengue by IgM-ELISA with and without 0.5M NaSCN
|
Patient
|
RT-PCR
|
Disease day
|
Index values*
|
|
Without NaSCN (cut off = 2.28)
|
With 0.5M NaSCN (cut off = 26.60)
|
|
D1
|
D2
|
D3
|
D4
|
D1
|
D2
|
D3
|
D4
|
|
1
|
D3
|
4
|
1.20
|
1.47
|
2.29
|
1.42
|
5.33
|
3.67
|
45.67
|
5.67
|
|
9
|
8.58
|
7.73
|
16.40
|
10.46
|
110.30
|
47.67
|
471.67
|
273.00
|
|
2
|
D2
|
7
|
4.89
|
52.18
|
7.96
|
4.49
|
128.00
|
1,246.00
|
670.00
|
239.00
|
|
14
|
5.27
|
37.93
|
8.87
|
5.42
|
68.00
|
395.00
|
243.70
|
179.00
|
|
3
|
D3
|
6
|
5.34
|
3.34
|
9.60
|
2.35
|
50.25
|
15.00
|
283.00
|
39.50
|
|
17
|
6.79
|
7.07
|
12.38
|
4.00
|
78.00
|
46.25
|
413.25
|
108.50
|
|
4
|
D3
|
8
|
5.61
|
2.84
|
9.20
|
2.63
|
67.25
|
12.75
|
305.50
|
77.00
|
|
10
|
4.77
|
3.16
|
9.10
|
3.45
|
54.00
|
14.00
|
274.20
|
97.20
|
|
5
|
D2
|
6
|
1.13
|
4.77
|
1.71
|
0.81
|
2.78
|
9.36
|
8.00
|
0.00
|
|
13
|
2.65
|
12.31
|
4.49
|
2.15
|
10.27
|
46.27
|
28.73
|
14.45
|
|
6
|
D3
|
6
|
3.07
|
1.75
|
6.55
|
0.89
|
11.83
|
4.00
|
140.33
|
2.50
|
|
8
|
4.06
|
2.40
|
9.23
|
1.34
|
21.00
|
6.83
|
198.33
|
11.83
|
|
7
|
D1
|
5
|
2.76
|
1.46
|
6.33
|
1.39
|
7.86
|
0.29
|
20.71
|
0.00
|
|
7
|
13.51
|
6.65
|
11.49
|
3.67
|
127.14
|
72.86
|
11.43
|
25.71
|
|
8
|
16.91
|
9.53
|
13.28
|
4.43
|
143.37
|
100.00
|
20.37
|
42.00
|
|
14
|
24.51
|
11.49
|
9.86
|
3.63
|
214.50
|
68.25
|
34.00
|
51.13
|
|
8
|
D1
|
7
|
1.73
|
3.89
|
1.66
|
1.45
|
5.54
|
6.38
|
6.00
|
1.62
|
|
11
|
6.95
|
10.19
|
2.27
|
1.76
|
26.42
|
20.25
|
19.00
|
10.17
|
|
9
|
D2
|
5
|
1.93
|
3.02
|
1.28
|
0.72
|
1.80
|
4.70
|
3.90
|
0.00
|
|
10
|
D2
|
ND
|
0.75
|
2.98
|
0.92
|
0.28
|
2.13
|
4.63
|
3.75
|
0.00
|
|
11
|
D1
|
5
|
1.25
|
1.28
|
1.32
|
0.69
|
4.00
|
1.57
|
10.71
|
0.00
|
|
12
|
D1
|
ND
|
20.35
|
15.44
|
15.02
|
8.00
|
161.28
|
36.71
|
39.90
|
97.71
|
|
13
|
D1
|
19
|
18.37
|
10.69
|
10.02
|
12.75
|
244.43
|
22.86
|
138.14
|
135.00
|
|
14
|
D1
|
8
|
7.55
|
6.78
|
6.41
|
3.37
|
50.25
|
11.67
|
27.92
|
19.92
|
|
15
|
D4
|
19
|
1.12
|
1.44
|
1.19
|
2.41
|
2.56
|
3.44
|
7.22
|
35.44
|
|
16
|
D1
|
5
|
1.36
|
1.13
|
1.27
|
0.27
|
6.27
|
1.45
|
2.45
|
0.00
|
|
17
|
D1
|
6
|
4.74
|
2.01
|
5.20
|
0.98
|
58.67
|
3.71
|
17.58
|
0.00
|
|
18
|
D1
|
15
|
14.18
|
8.39
|
8.52
|
3.58
|
137.38
|
33.27
|
31.00
|
49.88
|
D1 to
D4, dengue virus type 1 to 4, respectively. ND, not
determined.
* index values were calculated by the
formula A492 with the viral antigen/A492 with
uninfected control antigen.
The chaotropic agent, NaSCN,
is known to denature protein structure and inhibit the formation of immune
complexes as was exploited for immunoaffinity chromatography[12,13]. There are multiple factors which
affect NaSCN’s ability to highlight
serotype-specific reaction in comparison with cross-reaction in the ELISA.
One of the factors is a characteristic of dengue viral antigens, which are
prepared from the infected mosquito cell culture. It was reported that a
rapidly sedimenting haemagglutinin
(RHA) was cross-reactive and labile, but the soluble complement-fixing
antigen (SCF) was serotype-specific and relatively stable against the NaSCN treatment in the ELISA[11,14].
The predominant polypeptides in RHA and SCF fractions represent the envelope
glycoprotein and NS1, respectively[11].
Trent et al.[15,16] observed three antigenic
determinants on the envelope glycoprotein: (i) flavivirus group- reactive; (ii) complex-specific;
and (iii) serotype-specific. Henchal et al.[17] characterized four antigenic
determinants on the envelope glycoprotein: (i) flavivirus group-reactive; (ii) dengue
complex-specific; (iii) dengue subcomplex-specific;
and (iv) dengue serotype-specific.
Brandt et al.[14] reported that the DEN-2 SCF antigen
extracted from infected mouse brains was resistant to the treatment with
protein denaturing agents. Falconar and Young[18] reported serotype-specific epitopes on NS1. These results suggest that heterologous antigenic determinants on dengue viral
antigens contribute to the cross-reactivity among the four dengue serotypes, and that the presence of a chaotropic
agent in the reaction mixture induces changes of viral antigens and may
decrease the cross-reactive antigenicity.
In
conclusion, we demonstrated that the addition of NaSCN
to IgM-capture ELISA highlighted the detection of
serotype-specific IgM in comparison with serotype
cross-reactive IgM. This procedure may be useful
for determining infecting dengue virus serotypes, especially in primary
dengue virus infection.
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by a grant for research on emerging and re-emerging
infectious diseases from the Ministry of Health, Labour
and Welfare, Japan.
References
1. Hotta S. Twenty years of laboratory experience with
dengue virus. In Saunders M and Lennnet EH (Eds.),
1965, Medical and Applied Virology. Green, St Louis:
228-256.
2. Yamada
K, Takasaki T, Nawa M, Nakayama M, Arai TY, Yabe S and Kurane I. The features of imported dengue fever cases
from 1996 to 1999. Jpn J Infect Dis,
1999, 52: 257-259.
3. Yamada
K, Nawa M, Takasaki T, Yabe S and Kurane I. Laboratory diagnosis of dengue virus infection
by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and IgM-cpature enzyme-linked immunosorbent
assay (ELISA). Jpn J Infect Dis,
1999, 52: 150-155.
4. Nawa M, Yamada K, Takasaki T, Akatsuka
T and Kurane I. Serotype-cross-reactive
immunoglobulin M responses in dengue virus infections determined by
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Clin Diag Labo
Immunol, 2000, 7: 774-777.
5. Nawa M, Takasaki T, Yamada K, Akatsuka
T and Kurane I. Development of dengue IgM-cpature enzyme-linked immunosorbent
assay with higher sensitivity using monoclonal detection antibody. J Virol Methods, 2001, 92: 65-70.
6. Burke
DS. 1983. Rapid methods in the laboratory diagnosis of dengue virus
infections. In T Pang and R Pathmananathan (Eds.),
Proceedings of the International Conference on Dengue/Dengue Hemorrhagic
Fever. University of Malaya,
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia,
pp. 72-84.
7. Gubler DJ. Dengue and dengue hemorrhagic fever. Clin Microbiol Rev, 1998, 11:
480-496.
8. Innis BL. Antibody responses to dengue virus infection.
In DJ Gubler and G Kuno (Eds.),
Dengue and dengue hemorrhagic fever, Wallingford:
CAB International, 1997: 221-243.
9. Inouye
S, Hasegawa A, Matsuno S and Katow
S. Changes in antibody avidity after virus infections: detection by an immunosorbent assay in which a mild protein-denaturing
agent is employed. J Clin Microbiol,
1984, 20: 525-529.
10. Nawa M, Takasaki T, Yamada K, Kurane
I and Akatsuka T. Development of IgM-cpature enzyme-linked immunosorbent
assay for serodiagnosis of dengue using beta-propiolactone-inactivated dengue viral antigens. Dengue
Bulletin, 2003, 27: 95-99.
11. Nawa M. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent
assay using a chaotropic agent (sodium thiocyanate) for serotype specific reaction between cude dengue viral antigen and anti-dengue mouse antibody.
Microbiol Immunol, 1992,
36: 721-730.
12. Dandlinker WB and de Saussure
VA. Antibody purification at neutral pH utilizing immunospecific adsorbents.
Immunochemistry, 1968, 5: 357-365.
13. Avrameas S and Ternyck T. Use
of iodide salts in the isolation of antibodies and the dissolution of
specific immune precipitates. Biochem J, 1976, 102:
37c-39c.
14. Brandt
WE, Cardiff RD and
Russell PK. Dengue virions and antigens in brain
and serum of infected mice. J Virol, 1970, 6:
500-506.
15. Trent
DW, Harvey CL, Qureshi A and Lestourgeon D. Solid-phase
radioimmunoassay for antibodies to flavivirus
structural and nonstructural proteins. Infect Immunol,
1976, 13: 1325-1333.
16. Trent
DW. Antigenic characterization of flavivirus
structural proteins separated by isoelectoric
focusing. J Virol, 1977, 22: 608-618.
17. Henchal EA, Gentry MK, McCown
JM and Brandt WE. Dengue virus-specific and flavivirus
group determinants identified with monoclonal antibodies by indirect immunofluorescence. Am J Trop Med Hyg,
1982, 31: 830-836.
18. Falconar AKI and Young PR. Production of dimer-specific and dengue virus group cross-reactive
mouse monoclonal antibodies to the dengue 2 virus non-structural glycoprotein
NS1. J Gen Virol, 1991, 72: 961-965.
|