|
PDF Version
Sporadic Prevalence of DF/DHF in the Nilgiri and Cardamom Hills of Western
Ghats in South India: Is it a Seeding from Sylvatic Dengue Cycle A
Hypothesis
Nand Lal Kalra* and Chusak Prasittisuk**#
*A-38, Swasthaya
Vihar, Vikas Marg, Delhi 110 092
**Regional Office for South-East Asia, World Health
Organization, New Delhi, India
|
Abstract
The Western Ghats of south India, encompassing the Nilgiri and Cardamom
hills, are the wettest region of the country. Hills rising upto 3,000
metres receive over 200 cm of rainfall from both the south-west monsoon
(June to September) and north-eastern monsoon (October to January). The
eastern slopes of the Nilgiri Hills (200-500 metres) are bounded by Coimbatore and Erode districts of Tamil Nadu;
whereas the western slopes of the Nilgiri and Cardamom hills are in the
state of Kerala. The countryside has rich forests of teak and sandalwood,
interspersed by groves of coconut, rubber, pepper, cardamom and banana
plantations. Apart from the rich flora, monkeys (Macaca radiata) maintain a
strong association in orchards with humans competing for food.
The emergence of
DF/DHF in this hilly region is a recent occurrence. An epidemiological team
from the National Institute of Communicable Diseases (NICD) investigated
the first-ever reported outbreak in Coimbatore in 1998. In all, 20 serological positive
(IgM) cases were recorded by the city corporation. Five cases came from
urban towns and 15 cases from rural areas of the two districts of Coimbatore and Erode. Rural cases were scattered in
distantly located villages. Pyramid characterization and clustering of
cases was conspicuously absent. No attempt was made to link urban cases to
central/peripheral wards, nor the history of movement of patients two weeks
prior to the onset of fever was investigated. No increase in fever rate was
observed. DF cases did not show any relationship with presence/absence of
Aedes breeding. Aedes aegypti detected in urban centres failed to amplify
the infection.
Kerala state
also reported 116 cases in 1997, from Kottayam district. Out of these, 14
cases were confirmed serologically. After a lull of 4 years, 70 probable
cases out of 877 were reported from the four districts famous for rubber
plantations. Entomological investigations recorded only Aedes albopictus in
these areas. Considering the high experimental susceptibility of both
species of monkeys, viz. Macaca mulatta and Macaca radiata to yellow fever
virus, detection of dengue antigen in field collected Aedes albopictus in
Kozhikode (Kerala) and the evidence of transovarian transmission in Aedes
albopictus reared from soils of tree holes at Jodhpur Rajasthan (western
India) lend support to the hypothesis that DF in the Western Ghats of South
India exists as enzootic monkey Aedes albopictus monkey cycle and
causes epizootics among rural human population either during periodic
amplification of the enzootic cycle or as occupational hazards to the
people working in orchards.
Keywords: DF/DHF,
sporadic cases, Macaca radiata, dengue antigen in Aedes albopictus,
transovarial transmission, sylvatic cycle, Nilgiri and Cardamom hills,
south India.
|
The Western Ghats of south India encompass two
southern states i.e. Tamil Nadu and Kerala (Figure). The crests of the
Nilgiri and Cardamom Hills (rising upto 3,000 metres altitude) separate these
two states. The eastern slopes of the Nilgiri Hills have a gentle slope and
include two important district towns of Tamil Nadu, viz. Erode and
Coimbatore, situated at an altitude varying between 200 to 500 metres; each
with over one million population. This part of the region receives rains from
both the south-west and north-east monsoon. The south-west monsoons become
weak, being on the leeward side of the hills, but maximum rains come from the
north-east monsoon, the total being <100 cm. The forests are tropical
monsoon, which are famous for teak and sandalwood, with patches of arecanut
palms[1].
The western side of the Cardamon hills encompasses the state of Kerala.
Strong winds of the south-west monsoon lead to the formation of heavy sand
dunes in coastal areas and the rain water coming from the steep hills results
in formation of shallow lagoons, all along the coast, at places connected to
the sea. These lagoons are connected by canals. These backwaters are the
characteristics of Kerala state. The banks of these backwaters and sand dunes
are dotted with coconut trees[1].
The Region receives heavy rains (>200 cm) during the south-west monsoon.
Hence, the whole region is very wet and supports luxuriant growth. Large
tracts of forests have been cleared for raising cash crops, viz. arecanut
palms, rubber, banana, pepper and cardamom plantations[1].
Figure. Physical map of Kerala and adjoining areas of Tamil Nadu

Transmission of dengue viruses occurs in two cycles, viz. enzootic and
epidemic cycles. The enzootic cycle is a primitive sylvatic cycle maintained
by lower primates (monkeys) and canopy dwelling Aedes mosquitoes, as
reported from South-Asia[2], Africa[3] and Sri Lanka[4]. Current
epidemiological evidence suggests that these viruses do not regularly move
out of the forests to urban centres but at times are involved in an epidemic
cycle in small rural villages or islands[3]. A number of Aedes
species may act as reservoirs[2].
The epidemic cycle is confined to large urban centres. The viruses are
maintained in the Aedes aegypti human Aedes aegypti cycles
with periodic/cyclic epidemics. Generally all serotypes circulate and give
rise to hyperendemicity. Virus is maintained either transovarially by the
vectors or by continuous low-grade transmission in susceptible hosts added to
the population. DF/DHF in urban cycles is characterized by iceberg or
pyramid phenomenon. At the base most of the cases are symptom-less, followed
in increasing rarity, by undifferentiated fever, DF, DHF or DSS[5].
Occurrence of multiple cases in a single household or clustering of cases in
a locality is yet another characteristic of this disease[2].
In recent years the first outbreak of DF/DHF was reported from Kolkata
(earlier known as Calcutta) in 1963[6]. Since
then, more than 60 outbreaks have been reported from all over the country[7].
Aedes aegypti, invariably has been found to be associated with
these epidemics. All the four serotypes, DEN-1, 2, 3 and 4, are now
circulating in the country.
Since
1996-97, there have been reports of sporadic occurrence of DF/DHF cases in
Tamil Nadu and Kerala.
During 1998, a team from the National
Institute of Communicable Diseases (NICD), Delhi, investigated
the first-ever reported outbreak in Coimbatore[8], a town
situated at an altitude varying from 300 to 500 metres on the eastern slopes
of the Nilgiri Hills. The epidemiological characteristics of the outbreak are
summed up below:
In all, 20 serologically positive and
compatible to DF/DHF cases were reported. Eighty percent (16/20) were
children below 10 years and two patients aged 16 and 5 died of DHF.
Fourteen cases were males.
Seventeen cases came from Coimbatore
district and three cases from rural areas of adjoining Erode district.
Only five cases came from urban Coimbatore
town and the rest (12 cases) were from rural areas of Coimbatore
district.
Rural cases were scattered in distantly
located villages. Clustering of cases and
pyramid phenomenon was conspicuously absent. No attempt was made to
linkurban cases to central or
peripheral wards/zones nor the movement history of patients two weeks prior
to the onset of fever was investigated.
No relationship could be established between
outbreak and increased fever rate.
Eighty-nine percent of blood samples from
healthy contact persons from urban and rural areas showed dengue virus IgG
antibodies.
Entomological investigation recorded Aedes
aegypti in all areas surveyed in urban and rural areas, but failed to
amplify the infection.
During the 2003 outbreak in Coimbatore
town 23 cases of DF were recorded. Distribution once again followed the same
pattern, i.e. 5 cases from urban towns and 18 cases from rural areas (Source:
VBDC, New Delhi)
As per investigations undertaken by the Centre for
Research in Medical Entomology (CRME)[9], the state of Kerala
started reporting DF for the first time in 1997. Distribution of DF cases are
included in Table 1.
Table 1: Distribution
of DF cases in Kerala state during 1997-2001
|
Year
|
No. of suspected cases
|
No. serologically positive
|
Deaths
|
Districts
|
|
1997
|
116
|
14
|
4
|
Kottayam
|
|
1998
|
67
|
0
|
13
|
Kottayam
|
|
1999
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
Kottayam
|
|
2000
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Kottayam
|
|
2001
|
877
|
70
|
1
|
4
districts*
|
Table 2: Results of AedesY survey of 4
districts of Kerala state during 2001-2003
|
S. No.
|
Name of district
|
House index
|
Container index
|
Breteau index
|
Remarks
|
|
No. ex.
|
No. +ve
|
%
|
No. ex.
|
No. +ve
|
%
|
|
1.
|
Alappuzha
|
150
|
40
|
26.7
|
201
|
63
|
31.3
|
42.0
|
Types of containers and sites
of detection of Aedes breeding, viz. domestic/peri-domestic;
extradomestic not mentioned
|
|
2.
|
Ernakulam
|
24
|
10
|
41.7
|
54
|
41
|
75.9
|
170.8
|
|
3.
|
Kottayam
|
70
|
24
|
34.2
|
125
|
29
|
23.2
|
41.4
|
|
4.
|
Kozhikode
|
3,311
|
895
|
26.23
|
17,912
|
1,077
|
6.01
|
31.57
|
Pool rearing of larval breeding collected from all localities indicated
Aedes albopictus as the major species.
Aedes aegypti was
encountered in very few places and in scanty numbers (Source: NICD, Delhi, 2004)
Entomological investigation initiated by a CRME team in 2 localities of
Kottayam district yielded only Aedes albopictus, and Aedes aegypti
was not detected. Sylvan environment of rubber plantations was detected as
the unique habitat of the Aedes albopictus[10,11].
Results of yet another entomological study carried out by the National
Institute of Communicable Diseases (NICD) field station located at Kozhikode, in DF affected districts during
2001-2003, are included in Table 2.
During May
2004, a pool of landing collection of Aedes albopicuts (dessicated),
collected from the fringe of forested villages, 600 metres away from
Kozhikode (earlier known as Calicut) International Airport, yielded dengue
antigen (processed at CRME, Madurai)[12].
A recent
study has been carried out at the Desert Medicine Research Centre (DMRC), Jodhpur (Rajasthan), an institution
under the Indian Council of Medical Research, on possible existence of Aedes
albopictus monkey Aedes albopictus cycle. The highlights of
the study included that:
In a desert ecosystem, both Aedes aegypti
and Aedes albopictus breed in tree holes in zoo and monumental parks,
harbouring monkeys, outside the city limits.
Viable eggs retrieved from the soil of tree
holes were reared to adults. Aedes albopictus, when subjected to IFA
test, showed the presence of dengue antigen, thereby confirming the
transovarial cycle of the virus[13].
Occurrence of DF cases in peripheral
and rural areas of Coimbatore and Erode districts in Tamil Nadu and
non-amplification of infection by Aedes aegypti and sporadic
occurrence of DF cases in Kerala in the absence of Aedes aegypti
points out to either spillover of enzootic foci of dengue during periodic
amplification of the sylvatic cycles or occupational hazards in the presence
of vertical transmission as evidenced by the Kozhikode and Jodhpur studies.
Both the Nilgiri and Cardamom hills are infested
with Macaca radiata, the bonnet monkeys. Enzootic cycle of simian
malaria caused by Plasmodium cynomolgi and Plasmodium inui,
transmitted by Anopheles elegans (Anopheles dirus group)[14,15],
has been detected in the Nilgiri hills. Whereas in Kerala, a similar simian
foci has been detected at Nilambur district of the western slope in Macaca
radiata, while in Alappuzha (district in the central plains, earlier
known as Alleppey) monkeys were found negative for lack of Anopheles
elegans population[16].
Both the monkey species, viz. Macaca
mulatta and Macaca radiata have been found to be highly
susceptible to yellow fever virus (flaviviruses) under experimental
conditions[17]. This lends support to the susceptibility of these
monkeys to dengue virus as well.
Lack of vectorial competence of Aedes
albopictus in the amplification of urban dengue epidemic has recently
been demonstrated during the investigation of the first-ever DF outbreak at Phuentsholing,
Bhutan in 2004[18].
Entomological investigations revealed that Aedes aegypti occupied
domestic habitats breeding primarily in storage containers inside houses,
while Aedes albopictus bred in tree holes, 55-gallon drums and used
tyres in the extra-domestic habitats. The overlapping zone was the
peridomestic areas where both species shared breeding in flower vases/trash. A large-scale source
reduction/larvicidal campaign supported by deltamethrin fogging in
residential areas largely eliminated Aedes aegypti and the cases came
down to single digits within a month, while Aedes albopictus still
maintained high larval indices.
Rudnik and Lim[19], while working
in Malaysia,
isolated DEN-1, 2 and 3 viruses from monkeys and also proposed that the rural
dengue vector Aedes albopictus, may introduce sylvatic virus into
the human population.
Studies in Sri
Lanka proved that dengue virus causes
epizootics among macaques, rather than being enzootic as observed elsewhere[4].
Gubler[20], proposed that at some
point in the past, probably with the clearing of the forests and development
of human settlements, dengue viruses moved out of the jungles and into a
rural environment where they were, and still are transmitted to humans by
peri-domestic mosquitoes such as Aedes albopictus.
In view of the aforesaid, the land use in the Nilgiri hills of Tamil Nadu and
in the Cardamom hills in Kerala is under pressure of deforestation to be
replaced with cash crops. This has brought monkey populations much closer to
human settlements. Therefore, there is a need for indepth sero-epidemiological
and entomological studies with backup of virology support using molecular
tools for genomic sequencing of viruses obtained from simian and human
sources. Validation of the hypothesis is of great epidemiological
significance as it would require radical changes in developing vector control
strategies for Aedes albopictus-transmitted DF.
The author gratefully acknowledges Dr Duane J. Gubler for critically
reviewing the manuscript.
References
1. L
Dudley Stamp. Asia a regional
and economic geography. Reprinted Indian edition. New
Delhi: B.I. Publications, 1991.
2. Gubler
DJ. Dengue and dengue haemorrhagic fever, Clinical Microbiol Review, 1998,
11(3): 480-496.
3. Ricco-Hesse
R. Molecular evolution and distribution of dengue viruses type 1 and 2 in
nature. Virology, 1990, 174: 479-493.
4. de
Silva AM, Dittus WP, Amersinghe PH and Amersinghe FP. Serologic evidence for
an epizootic dengue virus infecting toque macaques (Macaca sinica) at Polonnaruwa,
Sri Lanka. Am J Trop
Med Hyg, 1999, 60(2): 300-306.
5. Guzman
MG and Kouri G. Dengue: an update. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 2002, 2:
33-42.
6. Ramakrishnan
SP, Gelfand HM, Bose PN, Sehgal PN, Mukherjee RN. The epidemic of acute
haemorrhagic fever, Calcutta,
1963 epidemiological inquiry. Ind
Jour Med Res, 1964, 52: 633-650.
7. Yadava
RL and Narasimham MVVL. Dengue/dengue haemorrhagic fever and its control in India.
WHO/Dengue Newsletter, 1992, 17: 3-8.
8. Singh
J, Balakrishnan N, Bhardwaj P, Muthadevi P, George EG, Subramani K,
Soundararajan K, Appavoo NC,
Jain DC,
Ichhpujani RL, Bhatia R and Sokhey J. Silent spread of DF/DHF to Coimbatore
and Erode districts in Tamil Nadu, India
1988. Need for effective surveillance to monitor and control the disease.
Epidemiol Infect, 2000, 125: 195-200.
9. Tyagi
BK, Hiriyan J and Tewari SC. Investigation on dengue fever in Kerala. Centre
for Research in Medical Entomology (Indian Council of Medical Research), Madurai
Annual Report 2001-2002: 66-68.
10. Hiriyan
J, Tewari SC
and Tyagi BK. Aedes albopictus breeding in plastic cups and tea-vendor spots
in Ernakulam city, Kerala state, India.
Dengue Bulletin, 2003, 27: 197-198.
11. Sumodan
PK. Potential of rubber plantations as breeding sources for Aedes albopictus
in Kerala, India.
Dengue Bulletin, 2003, 27: 197-198.
12. Das
BP, Kabilan L, Sharma SN, Lal S, Regu K, and Saxena VK. Detection of dengue
virus in wild caught Aedes albopictus (Skuse) around Kozhikode
airport, Malappuram district, Kerala, India.
Dengue Bulletin, 2004, 28 (in press).
13. Joshi
V, Singhi M and Mourya DT. Studies on determination of possible role of Aedes
albopictus mosquitoes in maintenance of urban cycle of dengue. Desert
Medicine Research Centre (Indian Council of Medical Research), Jodhpur.
Annual Report 2002-2003: 58-65.
14. Ramakrishnan
SP and Mohan BN. An enzootic focus of malaria in Macaca radiata radiata,
Geoffroy, of Nilgiris Madras state, India.
Ind J Malariology, 1962, 16:
87-94.
15. Pattanayak
S. A note on natural simian malaria infection in Kerala state, India.
Ind J Malarilogy, 1963, 17:
293-294.
16. Choudhury
DS. Investigations on simian malaria in India
and its potential as a source of zoonosis. Ind
J Malariology, 1981, 18: 28-34.
17. Kalra
NL and Sharma VP. Yellow fever threat. Current Science, 1996, 71(12): 948.
18. World
Health Organization. WHO mission to Bhutan
assistance to national authorities for control of dengue outbreak at Phuentsholing,
Bhutan (Draft report),
8-9 August 2004, WHO/SEARO, New Delhi.
19. Rudnik
A and Lim TW (Eds.). Dengue fever studies in Malaysia.
Bulletin from the Institute for Medical Research,
Malaysia, 1986, 23:
1-241.
20. Gubler
DJ. Dengue and dengue haemorrhagic fever: its history and resurgence as a
global public health problem. In: Gubler DJ and Kuno G (Eds.) Dengue and
dengue haemorrhagic fever. Wallingford:
CAB International, 1997: 1-23.
|