|
Russell’s Viper Bite: Correlation of
Different Clinical Criteria to Peritoneal Dialysis and Clinical Outcome
Paing Soe*
|
Abstract
A total of 107 Russell’s viper bite victims admitted to the Renal
Dialysis Unit of Yangon General Hospital in Myanmar during a one-year period were studied.
The study aimed at correlating different clinical criteria to the
requirement of peritoneal dialysis (PD) and to the clinical outcome. Subconjunctival haemorrhage
and gross haematuria were significantly
associated with the requirement of PD.
Mental changes, oedema, septicaemia, shock and the presence of PD indication(s)
turned out to be significant correlates of poor clinical outcome (death).
The causes of death in patients with and without PD were also analysed. The major causes of death in cases who died
after PD were septicaemia; cerebral cause (coma,
convulsions, confusion), and disseminated intravascular coagulation. In
patients without PD, shock was the number one killer, followed by pulmonary
oedema, and cardiac arrhythmias.
Key Words: Russell’s viper; Peritoneal dialysis;
Clinical outcome; Myanmar; Renal failure.
|
Introduction
Russell’s viper bite is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in Myanmar
and ranks high in the priority health problems identified in successive
People’s Health Plans. Acute renal failure is the major cause of death in
Russell’s viper bite patients who survive the early effects of envenoming.
Acute tubular necrosis was observed in renal biopsy and autopsy specimens of
human victims as well as in experimental animals1.
But the factors associated with requirement of peritoneal dialysis (PD) and
with clinical outcome in Russell’s viper bite victims had previously been
little known. This study was aimed to correlate different clinical features
to the requirement of PD and to the clinical outcome (death or discharge) in
viper bite patients. Moreover, survival of patients who required treatment with
PD, and those without, were compared and their causes of death were also analysed.
Methodology
Study area and population
A hospital-based prospective study was carried out during the one-year study
period (1 September 1993 to
30 August 1994) at the
Renal Dialysis Unit, Yangon General Hospital,
Myanmar. A total of 107
patients with Russell’s viper bite admitted to the Renal Dialysis Unit
directly or referred from other medical units of Yangon General Hospital or
other hospitals in Yangon and district hospitals (secondary referral centres) were included in the study. Viper bite was
proven by the dead snake brought along on admission, and/or by the features
of systemic envenoming (Box 1). Clinical
assessment and history-taking were done on admission. A detailed history
regarding first-aid treatment, time of anti-snake venom (ASV) administration,
and the nature of health care received was recorded. Clinical features were
noted and the progress was recorded daily. The cause of death was verified by
the senior medical officer concerned, which was further confirmed by the
postmortem examination.
|
Box 1. Features
of systemic envenoming in Russell's viper bite 8
|
|
Spontaneous
systemic bleeding especially from gums, gastrointestinal tract, haematuria and blood-stained sputum
Non-clotting
blood
Haemodynamic instabilities like hypotension,
tachycardia and shock
Epigastric pain/ renal angle pain
Oliguria/ anuria
Heavy
proteinuria (³ +++)
Conjunctival and periorbital oedema
Regional
lymph node enlargement and tenderness
|
Statistical analysis
Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed with survival status
(death or discharge) as the dichotomous outcome (dependent variable) and
other variables, such as age; sex; time lapse before ASV; first-aid; mental
changes; oedema; haematuria;and
subconjunctival haemor-rhage,
as independent variables. Addi-tionally, multiple
logistic regression analyses were also used to investigate the factors
associated with requirement for PD. In these analyses, PD requirement was the
dichotomous dependent variable, while others such as age, sex, time lapse
before ASV, first aid and other clinical criteria were the independent
variables. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software. P<0.05 was used as the definition
of statistical significance.
Ethical consideration
A written informed consent was obtained from patients after explanation of
the nature of the study. This study was approved by the Medical Ethics
Committee of the Department of Medical Research, Yangon,
Myanmar.
Results
Background characteristics of patients
Among the study population, 91 (85%) were males and 16 (15%) were females.
Their mean age was 29.78 years (range: 13 to 68 years). About 80% of them
were within the age range of 16 to 45 years with 16-25 years age group (37%)
comprising the major victims of viper bite. Of the total incidents 49.5%
occurred between 06:00 hrs and 17:30 hrs, and 50.5% between 18:00 hrs and 05:30
hrs. The median time lapse before ASV was three hours (range: 1 to 4 hours).
About 56% patients did not receive any form of first-aid therapy. In the
remainder, incisions were made at the site of bite (15.2%) or acupuncture
performed over the whole limb (21%). A small percentage (1.9%) applied
tourniquet proximal to the site of the bite. The clinical manifestations of
Russell’s viper bite cases on admission to the dialysis unit are summarized
in Table 1.
Correlation of different clinical
criteria with the requirement of peritoneal dialysis
Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the presence of haematuria had a definite relationship with PD
requirement. Patients with gross and persistent haematuria
within the first week of illness were more likely to require PD during their
course of illness. Subconjunctival haemorrhage was also found to have a significant
relationship to the requirement of PD (Table 2).
Table 1. Clinical manifestations on admission to dialysis unit
|
Clinical
manifestation
|
No.
(n= 107)
|
Per cent
|
|
Mental
changes
|
38
|
35.5%
|
|
Local
reaction
(local swelling/cellulitis)
|
49
|
46.1%
|
|
Periorbital oedema
|
71
|
66.4%
|
|
Subconjunctival
haemorrhage
|
48
|
45.8%
|
|
Chemosis
|
40
|
37.4%
|
|
Circulatory Overload *
|
10
|
9.3%
|
|
Shock
**
|
16
|
14.8%
|
|
Heart
failure
|
4
|
3.7%
|
|
Septicaemia
|
19
|
17.8%
|
|
Oliguria (less than
100 cc/day)
|
71
|
66.0%
|
|
Gross
haematuria
|
62
|
58.0%
|
|
Urinary tract infection
|
16
|
15.0%
|
* Orthopnoea,
raised jugular venous pressure (JVP), basal crackles, ± triple rhythm ± generalised oedema
** Systolic blood pressure (SBP)
≤60 mm Hg
Table 2. Correlates of
peritoneal dialysis: results of multiple logistic regression analysis
|
Variable a
|
Reference
category
|
Odds ratio
(95% CI)b
|
p-value
|
|
Sub-conjunctival
haemorrhage
|
No
sub-conjunctival haemorrhage
|
2.46
(1.35-7.13
|
0.04
|
|
Gross
haematuria
|
No gross
haematuria
|
11.73
(2.97-46.32)
|
0.001
|
a Other variables which
were considered but not statistically significant included age, sex, time
lapse before ASV, first aid measure, local reaction, mental changes, chemosis, shock, oliguria and septicaemia.
b 95% Confidence
Interval
Correlation of different clinical criteria to clinical outcome of patients
The results of multivariate logistic regression models that examined the
correlates of clinical outcome (death or discharge) are presented in Table 3.
Patients who developed mental disturbances either in the form of twitching,
fits or coma usually ended in a fatal outcome. When oedema,
either in the form of puffy face or generalized oedema
was calculated against the clinical outcome, it was found that, those patients
with oedema had a more serious prognosis than those
who did not develop oedema.
Table 3. Correlates of poor clinical outcome (death): results of
multiple logistic regression analysis
|
Variable a
|
Reference
category
|
Odds ratio
(95% CI)b
|
p-value
|
|
Mental
changes
|
No
mental
changes
|
4.62
(1.08-19.81)
|
0.002
|
|
Oedema
|
No oedema
|
16.17
(3.04-85.91)
|
0.004
|
|
Septicaemia
|
No septi-caemia
|
12.13
(1.99-32.5)
|
0.008
|
|
Shock
(SBP<
60 mmHg)
|
SBP
>60 mmHg
|
9.46
(1.73-51.77)
|
0.004
|
|
Presence of PD indication(s)
|
No PD indication
|
4.18
(1.19-14.63)
|
0.02
|
a Other variables which
were considered but not statistically significant included age, sex, time
lapse before ASV, first aid measure, subconjunctival
haemorrhage, chemosis and
haematuria
b 95% Confidence
Interval
Other factors that were associated with increased odds of poor clinical
outcome (death) were septicaemia, shock and
presence of PD indication(s).
PD requirement vs
survival
Nearly half of the viper bite victims (49%) were helped to recover and
discharged. The rest of them (51%) either succumbed, or signed and left the
hospital. Those who left were critically ill and their likely outcome was
very poor. Peritoneal dialysis was not required in all patients. Peritoneal
dialysis was usually needed and undertaken when biochemical or clinical
indications (Box 2) arose
in a viper bite patient (44 patients). Very rarely PD was not performed
although it was indicated on the basis of biochemical parameters as the
patient’s general well-being was good, and the urine output was satisfactory.
So the patient was kept under observation with daily monitoring of urea and
electrolytes. There was one such case in this study who survived with
conservative treatment. The impact of peritoneal dialysis on patient survival
is shown in Table 4. It was found that those with PD had less chances of
survival.
|
Box 2. Indications for peritoneal dialysis
in Russell's viper bite cases at renal and dialysis units, YangonGeneralHospital 8, 9
|
|
Biochemical
Plasma
urea > 35 mmol/L
Plasma
creatinine > 800 µmol/L
Plasma
K > 7 mmol/L or hyperkalaemic
ECG changes
Plasma
HCO3< 12 mmol/L
Clinical
Acute
pulmonary oedema, incipient heart failure with or
without intractable fluid overload
Clinical
uraemia (uraemic pericarditis, uraemic
bleeding)
Unexplained
clinical deterioration of patient
|
Table 4. The impact of peritoneal dialysis on patient survival in
Russell's viper bite cases
|
PD status
|
Survival
number
|
Survival
percent
|
|
Needed
and undertaken
|
17/ 44
|
38.6
|
|
Needed,
not undertaken
|
1/ 1
|
100
|
|
Not
needed, not undertaken
|
45/ 62
|
72.5
|
|
Not
needed, undertaken
|
−
|
−
|
Causes of death in patients with and without PD
The major causes of death in cases that died after peritoneal dialysis were septicaemia, cerebral cause (coma, convulsions, confusion) and disseminated intravascular coagulation. In
those patients without peritoneal dialysis, shock was the number one killer,
followed by pulmonary oedema, and cardiac
arrhythmias (Fig 1).
Patients with shock usually died
during the first week of viper bite before the level of blood urea rose
enough to require PD.
Discussion
The major victims of viper bites were between the age group of 16 to 35 years
of age in this study. Men were more commonly exposed to vipers as evidenced
by the predominant sex ratio of 6: 1. It was due to the fact that men were
the breadwinners of the family and they went out to work in rural
communities, whatever their occupations.
There seemed to be little difference between day and night regarding the time
of viper bite (49.5% of the incidents occurred in daytime Vs 50.4% during the
night). Farmers were exposed to snakes in the paddy fields during the day,
but they were also at risk when they returned home at dusk.
|
Figure 1. Causes of death in patients with and
without peritoneal dialysis in Russell's viper bite cases
 
|
Local reactions did not prove to have any influence in predicting the
prognosis of viper bite victims in this study. Although they were found to
have influenced the prognosis in 50% of the cases, they were statistically
found unrelated to the requirement of PD as well as to the clinical outcome
(death or discharge). Contrary to the present finding, some authors reported
that the extent of local swelling and the percentage circumference increase
of the bitten limb were found to correlate with the length of the snake.
There was a strong correlation between the venom yield and the length of the
viper. The incidence of systemic envenoming increased with the extent of
local swelling and lymphadenopathy.2, 3 But
it was stated in another report that, even in fatal patients with systemic envenomation, there were no local reactions at all4.
Also in Anuradhapura
(Sri Lanka),
27% of patients with systemic envenomation had mild
or negligible local swelling when admitted to hospital5.
In this study, more than half of
the cases did not apply any first-aid measures over the site of bite.
Multiple puncture (a traditional practice) seemed to be a popular practice
(21%) followed by incisions over the site of bite (15.2%). Whatever the
nature of first-aid measures may be, it was found that these measures had no
influence on PD requirement or clinical outcome of viper bite victims.
According to previous studies, sub-conjunctival haemorrhage and chemoses
occurred in patients with severe systemic envenoming and their presence
indicated serious prognosis6. In the present study, subconjunctival haemorrhage had
a significant relationship to the requirement of PD. But they were not proved
to be important indicators, which pointed towards a fatal clinical outcome.
Shock can develop at any time during the first week after the bite. Early
shock is probably explained by vasodilatation and late shock is precipitated
by massive GI haemorrhage or acute pituitary and
adrenal insufficiency7. Shock (systolic blood pressure ≤ 60
mmHg) was seen in 14.8% of study patients, and it was found to have a
significant relationship to poor clinical outcome.
Mg Mg Aye et al. reported that oliguria
may develop rapidly within 24 hours after the bite or during the first two to
three days. The signs of uraemia may develop within
three to seven days of the bite. Another important and reliable sign was
gross haematuria6. It was in agreement with our finding that if haematuria was persistently found on naked eye examination
within the first week of illness, it was likely that the patient would
require peritoneal dialysis.
This study might contribute to a better understanding of the importance of
clinical criteria in predicting the requirement of PD or clinical outcome in
Russell's viper bite patients, and could be helpful in the management of such
cases.
Acknowledgement
The author would like to thank the doctors and nursing staff at the Renal
Dialysis Unit, and the Laboratory staff at the Yangon
General Hospital,
for their help and support in conducting this study.
References
1. Aung Khin. Histological and ultrastructural changes of the kidney in renal failure
after viper envenomation. Toxicon,
1978; 16: 71-75.
2. Tun Pe, Ba
Aye, Aye Aye Myint, Tin Nu Swe, Warrel
DA. Bites by Russell's viper (Vipera russelli siamensis) in Myanmar:
effect of the snake’s length and recent feeding on venom antigenaemia
and severity of envenoming. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical
Medicine & Hygiene, 1991; 85: 804-808.
3. Myint Lwin, Phillips RE, Tun Pe, Warrel
DA., Tin Nu Swe, Mg Mg Lay. Bites by Russell's viper (Vipera
russelli siamensis) in Burma:
Haemostatic, vascular and renal disturbances and response to treatment.
Lancet, 1985; ii: 1259-63.
4. Maung Maung Aye. Snakes of Burma
with venomology and envenomation.
M.Sc (Zoology) Thesis 1976, Rangoon
Arts and Science University;
Pg 52-56.
5. Phillips
RE, Theakston RD,
Warrel DA. Paralysis, rabdomyolysis
and haemolysis caused by bites of Russel’s viper (Vipera russelli puchella) in Sri
Lanka; Failure of Indian (Haffkine) antivenom. Lancet,
1998; ii: 691-716
6. Maung Maung Aye. Some
experience in the management of snake-bite. Burma
Medical Journal, 1972; 20: 33-40.
7. Tun Pe, Phillips RE, Warrel DA, Moore RA, Tin Nu Swe, Myint Lwin.
Acute and chronic pituitary failure resembling Sheehan’s syndrome following
bites by Russell's viper in Burma.
Lancet, 1987; ii: 1259-63.
8. Warrel DA. WHO/ SEARO guidelines for the clinical management
of snakebites in South-East Asia Region. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Pub
Health, 1999; 30, supplement 1: 38.
9. Paing Soe & Saw Naung. A guide to management of Russell's viper bite,
2003. (Unpublished)
|