Food and Chemical Safety

Issues and Challenges

 

*     Food Safety

Despite the extent of foodborne diseases, many governments have no clearly articulated written policy on food safety, nor, in several countries, is there any one authority with a clear FOS mandate as the responsible authority. National Plans of Action for Nutrition (NPAN) are said to have been drawn up by all the ten countries of the Region. In most of these countries, however, such programmes are not yet seen as key policy statements of relevance to food control authorities.

The reluctance to establish documented policies and plans of action relevant to all participants in food safety is an indication of the lack in awareness of consumers, politicians and governments to recognize the true extent of the health and economic consequences of foodborne diseases. Ineffective communication, lack of data on the real costs of foodborne diseases, cultural habits, differing social values, traditions and taboos, contribute to this state of the art. Variations in the degree of law enforcement in different Member Countries are not only due to technical and human impairments, but also to organized and rampant fraud.

WHO has provided direction for the better integration of food safety policy through a number of initiatives, promoting the concept of and mechanisms for an intersectoral approach to issues related to food safety.

The 1998 SEARO Regional Consultation on Food Safety (27-30 October 1998) formulated, as an outcome from its deliberations, a 10-Point Regional Strategy for Food Safety in the South East Asia Region. The fundament for this work was the Declaration of the 1992 International Conference on Nutrition (ICN) where WHO had worked with national governments to achieve greater focus on the action-oriented themes identified as key issues. Member Countries were surveyed in December 1999 to determine progress in the implementation of the 10-Point Strategy.

The main challenges SEAR Governments  face in developing and implementing effective FOS strategies are, inter alia:

*     National food legislation in many Member Countries urgently needs updating and revision, effectively taking into account Codex recommendations and the FAO/WHO model food law.

*     An overarching food safety body at the national level, consisting of representatives of all stakeholders should be established to assure proper co-ordination of all food safety activities from production to consumption.

*     A need to increase the involvement of all stakeholders, the media and religious groups to expand the net to include those from disadvantaged and underprivileged groups in the community

*     Shortcomings in existing capacity to cope with statutory responsibilities in terms of regulatory testing and enforcement of foods consumed in the country, including imported foods, and to meet new challenges in this regard.

*     Lack of adequate databases on the incidence of food borne diseases  due to lack of effective surveillance programmes,  including weak food testing laboratories

*     Collection of economic cost of food borne disease outbreaks/other food safety issues such as export rejects would assist policy makers to realise the economic significance of the problem.

*     Reemphasis on educational/ training/communication from general hygiene/microbiology to chemical contaminants and the newer technologies such as GMO food products.

*     Regional and national capacities for establishing databases for food contaminant monitoring and foodborne disease surveillance should be strengthened. National focal points for both activities should be identified.

*     All Member States should review the qualifications and training of inspectors within the context of national needs and modern approaches, including HACCP.

*     All Member States should develop a broadly based participative risk communication strategy to promote better knowledge, attitudes and practices related to food safety issues.

*     The importance of research in identifying priority foodborne hazards, particularly chemical contaminants, and devising means for their prevention and control

*     Lack of adequate involvement of consumer organizations, food industry associations, academic and research institutions, in promoting awareness.

*     With the growth of the food processing industries, responsibility of the Governments for monitoring products has dramatically increased, well beyond their installed human, technical and financial capacities.

*     Difficulties in acceptance of concepts like GMP and HACCP at the level of the unorganized sector: food handlers/ retailers, small restaurants, grocery stores, street vendors.

*     Lack of a well defined policy relating to education and training, creation of awareness and involvement of consumers

 

*     Chemical Safety

According to the World Health Report 2002, environmental hazards are estimated to cause or to contribute to the premature death of millions of people and result in the ill health or disablement of millions more each year in countries of South East Asia Region. Environmental changes -both global and local- are having an increasing effect on health, particularly that of poor and vulnerable populations. One quarter of the global burden of disease is due to environmental health determinants. Children are more likely than adults to be exposed to contaminated water and soil, polluted air in the home, and toxic chemicals and are more vulnerable to the health effects of environmental contaminants. These factors contribute to over 5 million deaths globally each year among children.

The inadequate management of thousands of industrial, agricultural and household chemicals often result in unnecessary exposure to toxic chemicals, and sometimes in chemical incidents. Children who work from an early age in cottage industries - such as the bangle industry or production of fire crackers -are often exposed to toxic and hazardous chemicals that are widely and unsafely used.  Chronic exposure is linked to damage to the nervous and immune systems and to effects on reproductive function and development. Very little is done, so far, to protect specially children’s environmental health in most SEAR countries

Less than 10% of the 1000 tons of health care waste that are produced daily in the SEA region, are disposed off safely. Unsafe management of medical waste poses a series of life threatening risks- for all health personnel and patients, and also to the general public. Consequently, many used syringes and transfusion pipes reach rag pickers who siphon them off to scrap dealers who get them recycled back into the market, often without disinfection.

Air pollution, both indoor and ambient, is a major health threat to children. Nearly 75% of the population in the SEA Region cooks with biofuels. An estimated 500,000 women and children die in India each year due to indoor air pollution-related causes.  Outdoor air pollution, mainly from traffic and industrial processes, is a serious problem particularly in the ever-expanding megacities of SEAR countries.

Globally, the number of pesticide victims is estimated to be 3 million injured and 20.000 deaths. Data for SEAR is incomplete. SEAR still lacks capacity to respond and to prevent and manage poisonings: there are only 12 poison information centres in this region, where more than 25% of the world’s population lives.

Further, very little is done in terms of surveillance of health effects of chemical aetiology such as then ones from chronic exposures to POP’s and other persistent toxic substances. This situation is becoming more critical with the increasing possibility of having to deal with mass casualties from not only accidental, but also deliberate chemical, biological and radionuclear incidents in the region

 

| | | | | |