|
By
Ginny Tan Ai-leen* and Ren
Jin Song
Environmental Health Officers, Vector Control & Research
Department, Ministry of the Environment, 40 Scotts Road, #21-00, Singapore 228231
|
Abstract
Ovitraps are used extensively in Singapore as a tool to monitor, detect
and control Aedes populations. They give
an approximate gauge of the adult population in an area and act as an early
warning signal to pre-empt any impending dengue outbreaks. A Geographic
Information System (GIS) was established in 1998 to develop a real-time Aedes mosquito control and monitoring system for
spatial epidemiological study. The GIS monitors the network of 2000 ovitraps placed island-wide to better understand vector
trends and disease patterns. Analysis is done on the ovitrap
breeding data collected weekly to identify hotspots and risk areas where
there is a danger of high Aedes aegypti infestation. Three ovitrap
models had been developed to analyse the ovitrap breeding data collected. The analysis results
are used to plan vector surveillance and control operations. This paper
reports the experience of this control and monitoring methodology in Singapore.
Key words: GIS, Ovitrap, Dengue control, Aedes, Singapore.
|
Introduction
Singapore is a tropical island with a land
area of 682.7 sq km and a population of four million, characterized by
uniform temperature (mean daily » 26.8° C), high humidity (mean daily »
84.3%) and abundant rainfall (mean annual » 2346 mm) throughout the year. The
city-state lies just north of the equator near latitude 1.5 deg N and
longitude 104 deg E.
Dengue
is endemic in Singapore and has seen a recent resurgence despite an effective
vector control programme based on a three-pronged
approach that incorporates source reduction, public health education and law
enforcement(1). Several factors resulted in the resurgence of
dengue in Singapore. The immunity level of the
population has declined(1)
while adult densities of the Aedes vectors
have multiplied due to the rise in temperatures and increased rainfall(2).
Climatic changes have been reported to affect the biology and behaviour of the vectors, allowing them to develop higher
competence for dengue transmission(3).
Ovitraps
Ovitrap surveys could be considered a sensitive and an
efficient technique for detecting and monitoring Aedes
populations at low densities. They are safe, economical and environment-friendly(4). With only 10% of the
island under active Aedes mosquito field
surveillance due to limited manpower for vector control, the extensive use of
ovitraps is an important resource to help collect
data on Aedes population on a wider area and
gauge the effectiveness of control efforts.
Currently,
ovitraps (Figure 1) are used as a means of
detecting Aedes aegyptipresence as well as an approximate gauge of the adult population in an
area. It can be used to estimate fairly well the population of adult
mosquitoes in the environment by counting the number of eggs laid on the
moist paddle. In this way, a sudden increase of mosquito population can be
detected. Changes in the species breeding (Aedes
aegypti to Aedes albopictus or vice versa) can also be detected. The ovitraps are checked weekly for breeding and the breeding
samples, if any, are collected and identified by the laboratory. The ovitraps are then cleaned to remove any eggs that are
stuck on the inner walls of the ovitraps, re-filled
with cow grass solution which is much more attractive to the female
mosquitoes than just water, and placed back in their positions. The paddles
are collected and replaced with new ones. The collected paddles are checked
under the microscope for eggs which are also counted.
Figure 1. Diagram of an Ovitrap

There
are 2000 ovitraps placed on the island currently,
30% are placed inside premises, while 70% are placed outside premises under
shade. Most of the premises are residences although there are some which are
schools and commercial buildings. The bulk of the ovitraps
are placed in dengue "sensitive areas (SAs)"
where regular search-and-destroy rounds are carried out. Others are placed in
previous SAs that had already been cleaned up, for
early detection of any resurgence of the vector. Some are also placed in
persistent complainants’ homes to determine the mosquito species that cause
the nuisance.
Geographic Information System (GIS)
A
GIS is an automated computer-based system with the ability to capture,
retrieve, manage, display and analyse large
quantities of spatial and temporal data in a geographical context. The system
comprises hardware (computer and printer), software (GIS software), digitized
base maps, information and a whole set of procedures such as data collection,
management and updating(5).
Specific
diseases and public health resources can be mapped in relation to their
surrounding environment and existing health and social infrastructures. Such
information when mapped together creates a powerful tool for the monitoring
and management of disease(6).
GIS provides a graphical analysis of epidemiological indicators over time,
captures the spatial distribution and severity of the disease, identifies
trends and patterns and indicates where there is a need to target extra
resources.
In
1998, a GIS was established in Singapore to research as well as to
support operations on dengue control. Roads, residential buildings and other
relevant databases were obtained and mapped to form the base map layer using Arcview GIS 3.2a. Other layers such as Aedes breeding sites, dengue case incidences,
complainants’ addresses, sensitive areas, weather data (rainfall, temperature
and relative humidity) and other related information were also mapped into
the GIS.
Application of GIS on ovitraps
An
ovitrap layer comprising a spatial map and an attribute
table was created in the GIS for monitoring and analysing
the network of ovitraps placed island-wide to
better understand vector trends and disease patterns (Figure 2). Every ovitrap placed is given a unique number for
identification and its spatial location is stored in the GIS. The attribute
table behind this ovitrap layer stores the ovitrap’s identification number, the surveillance team in
charge of the ovitrap, the date of the weekly
collection, the address of the site, the housing type of the site (e.g. flat,
house, school, etc.), the position of the ovitrap
(indoor or outdoor), the status of the ovitrap
(removed or missing), the species found in the ovitrap,
the larval instars and pupal stages, the breeding
density, the mixed breeding species types (e.g. Aedes
aegypti and Aedes
albopictus, Aedes
aegypti and Culex
quinfasciatus, etc.) and the dominant
species type breeding in that ovitrap for that
week. In the case of a mixed breeding, the species which had a higher density
would be the dominant species. Decisions on operations and deployment of
manpower are made using the ovitrap information as
well as databases on diseases and mosquito surveillance results.
Routine monitoring of Aedes aegypti
Analysis
is done on the results collected weekly to identify hotspots or risk areas
where there is a danger of Aedes aegypti infestation, to pre-empt any impending
dengue outbreak. As a huge amount of data is collected weekly, there is a
need to sieve out only the important and useful information. A query is done
to gather all the Aedes aegypti breeding ovitrap
sites as this mosquito is known to be the primary vector in the transmission
of dengue in Singapore(7). These ovitrap
sites would be sorted by density and addresses to highlight high breeding
areas and areas with many breeding ovitraps. These ovitrap sites are also clustered if there are two or more
Aedes aegypti breeding
ovitraps within a distance of 250 metres. This distance is the normal flight distance of
the vector, which is not further than 240 metres in
Singapore(8). The distribution of Aedes aegypti
breeding in the ovitraps for each SA is also
summarized weekly to highlight the "hot" SAs
where total breeding density in ovitraps remains
relatively high for a number of weeks when compared with other SAs. Another important indicator is the change in the
dominant species of a particular ovitrap. If other
mosquito species had been detected consistently and Aedes
aegypti is suddenly found in the ovitrap, then that area will be placed on high alert and
monitored carefully. This change means that the vector has invaded an area
where it was not previously found and an outbreak might soon occur.
Ovitrap models
Three
models had been developed to monitor, analyse and
evaluate ovitrap breeding data to better understand
the Aedes situation on the island for
surveillance purposes.
Hotspot model
A
hotspot ovitrap model was developed to display,
identify and highlight ovitrap sites that have been
breeding above a certain density level for a specific number of weeks during
a defined time period. For example, we set the density as greater than one
larva or pupa per ovitrap and the time period as
four weeks to identify ovitraps that had been
breeding consistently for the past four weeks. This model is particularly useful
for identifying areas that had been having high Aedes
aegypti population density consistently for
some time and should be paid extra attention. It can also be used to gauge
whether control efforts in the area have been effective or successful.
Query model
The
query model was developed to generate and display bar graphs of total ovitrap breeding density for a specific SA or any
selected area for a defined time period by weeks. With this model,
surveillance teams are able to query the ovitrap
breeding situation in an area for any defined time period. Figure 3 shows the
query model and results displayed for Race Course Road for the year 2000.
Inactive ovitraps model
The
inactive ovitrap model was developed to identify ovitrap sites with low or no breeding for a defined time
period (Figure 4). These locations are then evaluated to see if there
was a need for the ovitraps to be shifted to
another location where breeding might be detected to promote more efficient
use of the ovitrap.
Discussion
With
the build-up of epidemiological and entomological databases, the next step
would be to develop spatial analytical methods and models to test hypotheses
concerning vector and disease relationships and the nature and processes of
disease transmission. These modellings will involve
the integration of GIS with standard statistical and epidemiological methods.
The spatial modelling capacities offered by GIS can
help one understand the spatial variation in the incidence of disease and its
covariation with environmental factors and public
health systems. Important technical and logistical innovations in data and
data access for GIS are already available in the market. There has also been
greater accessibility to global positioning systems and availability of
inexpensive hand-held devices for using the system and the addition of
direct-to-GIS data links to these systems(9).
Singapore will start using palmtops to
gather field Aedes surveillance data in the
near future. We are working to develop an optimal ovitrap
sampling frame and eventually come up with an accurate ovitrap
index as an indicator for actions. With the use of ovitraps
and the GIS, the task of vector and disease surveillance will be brought to
greater heights. Information will be available in realtime
and other discoveries about the relationship between vector and the disease
could be made possible through spatial analyses. A greater understanding of
the vectors would bring us a step closer to eradicating dengue fever in Singapore.
Acknowledgements
We
would like to express our sincere thanks to Miss Tan Boon Teng,
Head of the Vector Control & Research Department, Ministry of the
Environment, Singapore, for reviewing this manuscript.
References
1. Goh KT. Dengue – A re-emerging infectious disease in Singapore.
In: Dengue in Singapore,
Technical Monograph Series, No.2, Institute of Environmental Epidemiology,
Ministry of the Environment, Singapore,
1998:33-40.
2. Heng BT, Goh KT and Neo
KS. Environmental temperature, Aedes aegypti
house index and rainfall as predicators of annual epidemics of dengue fever
and dengue haemorrhagic fever in Singapore.
In: Dengue in Singapore,
Technical Monograph Series, No.2, Institute of Environmental Epidemiology,
Ministry of the Environment, Singapore,
1998:138-149.
3. Jonathan
A. Partz, Willem JM Martens, Dana A. Focks and Theo H. Jetten.
Dengue fever epidemic potential as projected by general circulation models of
global climate change. Environmental Health Perspectives Vol. 106, No. 3, Mar
1998:147-153.
4. Chan
KL, Ng SK,
Tan KK. An autocidal ovitrap
for the control and possible eradication of Aedes
aegypti. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Pub. Hlth. Vol. 8, No. 1, Mar 1977:56-62.
5. WHO Division of Control of Tropical Diseases – Health Map - What is GIS? URL: http://www.who.int/ctd/html/hmapwhatis.html.
6. WHO
Division of Control of Tropical Diseases – Health Map – Using GIS in public health. URL: http://www.who.int/ctd/html/hmapph.html.
7. Chan
KL, Ng SK, Chew LM. The 1973 dengue haemorrhagic
fever outbreak in Singapore
and its control. Singapore
Med J Vol. 18, 1977:81-93.
8. Liew C, Pang FY, Chen C. The ovipositional
dispersal in the field of the dengue vectors, Aedes
aegypti and Aedes
albopictus - A comparison of three sites. In: 2nd
Seminar on Joint Research between Ministry of the Environment, Nanyang Technological University and National University
of Singapore, May 1999.
9. Clarke
KC, Mclafferty SL, Tempalski
BJ. On epidemiology and geographic information systems: a review and
discussion of future directions. Emerging Infectious Disease Vol. 2, No. 2, Apr–Jun 1996. URL: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/EID/
vol2no2/clarke.htm.
|